All-Pay Hex: A Multibattle Contest With Complementarities∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we examine a modified 2 × 2 game of Hex in which control of each cell is determined by a Tullock contest. The player establishing a path of cells within his control between his two sides wins a fixed prize. Examining the polar cases of all cells being contested simultaneously versus all four cells being contested sequentially, we show that there is an increase in the total expected value for the players in the sequential case compared to the simultaneous case. Furthermore, due to the players having different, albeit symmetric winning combinations, in the sequential case one player may have a greater expected value than their opponent, which depends on the order of the cell contests. We thus provide a canonical model of a multibattle contest in which complementarities between battlefields are heterogeneous across both battlefields and players.
منابع مشابه
All-pay 2×2 Hex: a multibattle contest with complementarities
We examine a modified 2 × 2 game of Hex in which the winner of each cell is determined by a Tullock contest. The player establishing a winning path of cells in the game wins a fixed prize. Examining the polar cases of all cells being contested simultaneously versus all four cells being contested sequentially, we show that there is an increase in the total expected payoff for the players in the ...
متن کاملElectoral College: A Multibattle Contest with Complementarities
The Electoral College system used to elect the President of the United States is an example of a multibattle contest with complementarities. Due of heterogeneity in the value of the different state level sub-contests, many different combinations of state victories can lead to an overall victory which impacts contestant strategy. This paper develops a theoretical of such a multibattle contest wi...
متن کاملAn Experimental Investigation of Simultaneous Multi-battle Contests with Complementarities
This paper reports the results of laboratory experiments that are designed to test theoretical predictions in a multi-battle contest with complementarities. The specific setting is a game of Hex where control of each region is determined by a Tullock contest and the overall winner is determined by the combination of claimed regions. We find that in a game with only a few regions, aggregate beha...
متن کاملLottery versus All - Pay Auction Contests A Revenue Dominance
We allow a contest organizer to bias a contest in a discriminatory way, that is, she can favor specifi c contestants through the choice of contest success functions in order to maximize total equilibrium eff ort (resp. revenue). The scope for revenue enhancement through biasing is analyzed and compared for the two predominant contest regimes; i.e. all-pay auctions and lottery contests. Our main...
متن کاملLottery versus all-pay auction contests: A revenue dominance theorem
We allow a contest organizer to bias a contest in a discriminatory way, that is, she can favor specifi c contestants through the choice of contest success functions in order to maximize total equilibrium eff ort (resp. revenue). The scope for revenue enhancement through biasing is analyzed and compared for the two predominant contest regimes; i.e. all-pay auctions and lottery contests. Our main...
متن کامل